The article holistically discusses the alleged new EU return system which the Pact on Migration and Asylum heralds. Absent any impact assessment accompanying the key draft legislative measures and any implementation report regarding the existing legislative instruments following the 2015 refugee-protection crisis, it provides both a substantial and a formal assessment of the proposed reform. A substantial analysis reveals that the two main objectives of the EU return system, namely effectiveness and human rights compliance, are pitted against each other to the detriment of human rights compliance and that effectiveness is questionably narrowed to return rate. Looking at the key components of the return system under the Pact and taking into account past interinstitutional negotiations in the field, it shows that the draft proposals are not conducive to fulfilling these objectives. From a formal standpoint, the article questions the weight of the Commission's proposals on the future outcome of the current negotiations based on their lack of legitimacy.

中文翻译：

---

《移民和庇护公约》下的欧盟遣返制度：机构间平衡倾斜的案例？

文章全面讨论了《移民和庇护公约》预示的所谓新的欧盟返回制度。由于关键立法措施草案和任何关于 2015 年难民保护危机之后现有立法文书的实施报告没有附带任何影响评估，它提供了对拟议改革的实质性和正式评估。大量分析表明，欧盟退货制度的两个主要目标，即有效性和遵守人权，相互对立，不利于遵守人权，而且有效性被限制为退货率。审视《公约》下返回制度的关键组成部分，并考虑到过去在该领域进行的机构间谈判，这表明提案草案不利于实现这些目标。从正式的角度来看，该条款质疑委员会的提案对当前谈判的未来结果的重要性，因为它们缺乏合法性。