In recent literature, the noun ‮ܫܡܝܐ‬‎ has been described as a singular in the book of Isaiah, ostensibly on the basis of the lack of syame. I will argue to the contrary, demonstrating that it should be described as a plural in this corpus. The key to proper interpretation of the form is agreement with other clausal and phrasal constituents, not the presence or absence of syame.

中文翻译：

---

旧约的叙利亚语译者 Peshitta 是把 fusion 看作单数还是复数？

在最近的文献中，以赛亚书中的名词 „„„„„„„„„„从表面上看，是因为缺少syame。我将提出相反的观点，证明它应该在这个语料库中被描述为复数形式。正确解释形式的关键是与其他从句和短语成分一致，而不是syame的存在或不存在。