This content analysis (N = 1,527) examined the presence of rape culture acceptance (dismissal of event, victim blaming, discrediting survivor, and threats to survivor) and anti-rape culture (support for survivor, and mention of: systemic problem, rape culture, and male power dominance) in news coverage of Anita Hill and Christine Blasey Ford’s testimony against a U.S. Supreme Court nominee. Results show higher rape acceptance in Blasey Ford news coverage and no difference between the cases and anti-rape culture. Online news media focused on personal impact to Blasey Ford, while traditional news media focused on impact to Thomas Kavanaugh and Clarence Thomas.

该内容分析 ( N = 1,527) 检验了强奸文化接受度（事件的解雇、受害者指责、诋毁幸存者和对幸存者的威胁）和反强奸文化（支持幸存者，并提及：系统性问题、强奸文化）的存在和男性权力主导）在安妮塔希尔和克里斯汀布莱西福特针对美国最高法院提名人的证词的新闻报道中。结果表明，布莱西福特新闻报道中的强奸接受度更高，案件与反强奸文化之间没有差异。在线新闻媒体关注的是对 Blasey Ford 的个人影响，而传统新闻媒体关注的是对 Thomas Kavanaugh 和 Clarence Thomas 的影响。