Urban planning implementation evaluation (UPIE) is an important tool for the supervision and inspection of the outcomes, processes and effectiveness of planning implementation. Conformance-based evaluation refers to the exploration of the degree of coincidence between actual situations and planning contents. Decision-centred performance evaluation focuses on exploring the role and purpose of plans in the implementation process. Although consensus has been reached on conformance and decision-centred performance evaluation, goal-oriented performance evaluation needs further development. Therefore, the integrated theoretical framework of UPIE, which emphasizes social effectiveness, has been constructed with goal-oriented performance in mind. It is suggested that performance-based evaluation that focuses on social effectiveness reveals the gap between actual situations and planning goals and can be established by the degree of realization of planning goals. Meanwhile, it has put forward a service-capabilities-based evaluation methodology which relies on the spatial matching between service supply and user group demands. Taking the Urban Master Plan of Xi’an (2008–2020) as an example, the results of UPIE show that this blueprint needs further revisions and adjustments. Through a goal-oriented methodology, the integrated theoretical framework can attract more attention to social effectiveness.

城市规划实施评估（UPIE）是对规划实施的结果、过程和有效性进行监督和检查的重要工具。一致性评价是指探索实际情况与规划内容的吻合程度。以决策为中心的绩效评估侧重于探索计划在实施过程中的作用和目的。虽然在一致性和以决策为中心的绩效评估已经达成共识，但以目标为导向的绩效评估还需要进一步发展。因此，基于目标导向的绩效构建了 UPIE 强调社会有效性的综合理论框架。建议关注社会效益的绩效评价揭示了实际情况与规划目标之间的差距，可以通过规划目标的实现程度来确定。同时，提出了一种基于服务能力的评价方法，该方法依赖于服务供给与用户群需求的空间匹配。以西安城市总体规划（2008-2020）为例，UPIE的结果表明，该蓝图需要进一步的修订和调整。通过以目标为导向的方法论，整合的理论框架可以吸引更多的社会效益关注。它提出了一种基于服务能力的评估方法，它依赖于服务供应和用户群体需求之间的空间匹配。以西安城市总体规划（2008-2020）为例，UPIE的结果表明，该蓝图需要进一步的修订和调整。通过以目标为导向的方法论，整合的理论框架可以吸引更多的社会效益关注。它提出了一种基于服务能力的评估方法，它依赖于服务供应和用户群体需求之间的空间匹配。以西安城市总体规划（2008-2020）为例，UPIE的结果表明，该蓝图需要进一步的修订和调整。通过以目标为导向的方法论，整合的理论框架可以吸引更多的社会效益关注。