当前位置: X-MOL 学术J. Virol. Methods › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Evaluation of spike protein antigens for SARS-CoV-2 serology
Journal of Virological Methods ( IF 2.2 ) Pub Date : 2021-06-29 , DOI: 10.1016/j.jviromet.2021.114222
Suraj Jagtap 1 , Ratnasri K 2 , Priyanka Valloly 1 , Rakhi Sharma 1 , Satyaghosh Maurya 1 , Anushree Gaigore 1 , Chitra Ardhya 3 , Dayananda S Biligi 3 , Bapu Koundinya Desiraju 4 , Uma Chandra Mouli Natchu 5 , Deepak Kumar Saini 6 , Rahul Roy 7
Affiliation  

Background

Spike protein domains are being used in various serology-based assays to detect prior exposure to SARS-CoV-2 virus. However, there has been limited comparison of antibody titers against various spike protein antigens among COVID-19 infected patients.

Methods

We compared four spike proteins (RBD, S1, S2 and a stabilized spike trimer (ST)) representing commonly used antigens for their reactivity to human IgG antibodies using indirect ELISA in serum from COVID-19 patients and pre-2020 samples. ST ELISA was also compared against the EUROIMMUN IgG ELISA test. Further, we estimated time appropriate IgG and IgA seropositivity rates in COVID-19 patients using a panel of sera samples collected longitudinally from the day of onset of symptoms (DOS).

Results

Among the four spike antigens tested, the ST demonstrated the highest sensitivity (86.2 %; 95 % CI: 77.8–91.7 %), while all four antigens showed high specificity to COVID-19 sera (94.7–96.8 %). 13.8 % (13/94) of the samples did not show seroconversion in any of the four antigen-based assays. In a double-blinded head-to-head comparison, ST based IgG ELISA displayed a better sensitivity (87.5 %, 95 % CI: 76.4–93.8 %) than the EUROIMMUN IgG ELISA (67.9 %, 95 % CI: 54.8–78.6 %). Further, in ST-based assays, we found 48 % and 50 % seroconversion in the first six days (from DOS) for IgG and IgA antibodies, respectively, which increased to 84 % (IgG) and 85 % (IgA) for samples collected ≥22 days from DOS.

Conclusions

Comparison of spike antigens demonstrates that spike trimer protein is a superior option as an ELISA antigen for COVID-19 serology.



中文翻译:


SARS-CoV-2 血清学刺突蛋白抗原的评估


 背景


刺突蛋白结构域被用于各种基于血清学的检测中,以检测之前是否接触过 SARS-CoV-2 病毒。然而,针对 COVID-19 感染患者中各种刺突蛋白抗原的抗体滴度的比较有限。

 方法


我们使用间接 ELISA 方法比较了代表常用抗原的四种刺突蛋白(RBD、S1、S2 和稳定的刺突三聚体 (ST))与人 IgG 抗体的反应性,这些蛋白来自 COVID-19 患者的血清和 2020 年前的样本。 ST ELISA 还与 EUROIMMUN IgG ELISA 测试进行了比较。此外,我们使用从症状出现之日起纵向收集的一组血清样本(DOS)估计了 COVID-19 患者中适当时间的 IgG 和 IgA 血清阳性率。

 结果


在测试的四种刺突抗原中,ST 表现出最高的敏感性(86.2%;95%CI:77.8-91.7%),而所有四种抗原都对 COVID-19 血清表现出高特异性(94.7-96.8%)。 13.8% (13/94) 的样品在四种基于抗原的检测中均未显示血清转化。在双盲头对头比较中,基于 ST 的 IgG ELISA 显示出比 EUROIMMUN IgG ELISA(67.9 %,95 % CI:54.8–78.6 %)更好的灵敏度(87.5 %,95 % CI:76.4–93.8 %) )。此外,在基于 ST 的检测中,我们发现 IgG 和 IgA 抗体在前六天(从 DOS 开始)分别有 48% 和 50% 的血清转化率,对于收集的样品,血清转化率增加到 84% (IgG) 和 85% (IgA)距 DOS ≥22 天。

 结论


刺突抗原的比较表明,刺突三聚体蛋白是作为 COVID-19 血清学 ELISA 抗原的绝佳选择。

更新日期:2021-07-05
down
wechat
bug