In a recent article in this journal, José María Ariso makes the argument that the killing of innocent, non-threatening people is not a universal moral certainty. To make this case, he gives two examples where the certainty is seemingly not present: the pisa-suave child soldiers in the Colombian civil war and the often-discussed case of Nazi Germany. This paper is an attempt to respond to these criticisms. I will respond to each charge in turn and argue that they do not pose a problem to the idea that the wrongness of killing innocent, non-threatening people is a universal moral certainty.

中文翻译：

---

为什么杀死无辜、没有威胁的人的错误是普遍的道德确定性

在该杂志最近的一篇文章中，何塞·玛丽亚·阿里索 (José María Ariso) 提出，杀害无辜、没有威胁的人并不是普遍的道德确定性。为了证明这一点，他举了两个似乎不存在确定性的例子：哥伦比亚内战中比萨温和的儿童兵和经常讨论的纳粹德国案例。本文试图回应这些批评。我将依次回应每一项指控，并争辩说它们不会对杀害无辜、没有威胁的人的错误是普遍道德确定性的观点构成问题。