当前位置: X-MOL 学术Behavioral Interventions › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
A comparison of most to least prompting, no-no prompting and responsive prompt delay procedures
Behavioral Interventions ( IF 1.1 ) Pub Date : 2021-06-28 , DOI: 10.1002/bin.1808
Denise Foran‐Conn 1 , Marguerite Hoerger 1 , Eimear Kelly 1 , Richard Cross 1 , Serena Jones 1 , Hannah Walley 1 , Lauren Firth 1
Affiliation  

Discrete trial training is a commonly used to teach children with autism spectrum disorder and related intellectual disabilities. A number of prompting and error correction strategies can be implemented when using discrete trial training. These strategies need to be effective and efficient. We compared a novel procedure, responsive prompt delay, to most to least prompting and no-no prompting. A parallel treatments design, nestled in a modified multiple probe design (Horner & Baer, 1978), was used to compare the three procedures with three participants. The responsive prompt delay procedure was at least as effective as the most to least prompting and no-no prompting procedures for three participants; the time required for each participant to master the skills was variable across procedures.

中文翻译:

最多提示与最少提示、无提示和响应提示延迟程序的比较

离散试验训练是一种常用于自闭症谱系障碍和相关智力障碍儿童的教学。在使用离散试验训练时,可以实施许多提示和纠错策略。这些策略需要有效和高效。我们比较了一种新颖的程序,响应提示延迟,最多到最少提示和无提示。采用改进的多探针设计 (Horner & Baer,​​ 1978) 的平行治疗设计,用于将三个程序与三个参与者进行比较。对三名参与者而言,响应式提示延迟程序至少与最多到最少提示和无提示程序一样有效;每个参与者掌握技能所需的时间因程序而异。
更新日期:2021-06-28
down
wechat
bug