当前位置: X-MOL 学术npj Breast Cancer › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Composite risk and benefit from adjuvant dose-dense chemotherapy in hormone receptor-positive breast cancer
npj Breast Cancer ( IF 5.9 ) Pub Date : 2021-06-28 , DOI: 10.1038/s41523-021-00286-w
Fabio Puglisi 1, 2 , Lorenzo Gerratana 1, 2 , Matteo Lambertini 3, 4 , Marcello Ceppi 5 , Luca Boni 5 , Filippo Montemurro 6 , Stefania Russo 7 , Claudia Bighin 8 , Michelino De Laurentiis 9 , Mario Giuliano 10 , Giancarlo Bisagni 11 , Antonio Durando 12 , Anna Turletti 13 , Ornella Garrone 14 , Andrea Ardizzoni 15 , Teresa Gamucci 16 , Giuseppe Colantuoni 17 , Adriano Gravina 18 , Sabino De Placido 10 , Francesco Cognetti 19 , Lucia Del Mastro 3, 20
Affiliation  

The GIM2 phase III trial demonstrated the benefit of dose-dense chemotherapy in node-positive early breast cancer (eBC). To better define the dose-dense effect in the hormone receptor-positive subgroup, we evaluated its benefit through a composite measure of recurrence risk. We conducted an ancillary analysis of the GIM2 trial evaluating the absolute treatment effect through a composite measure of recurrence risk (CPRS) in patients with hormone receptor-positive HER2-negative eBC. CPRS was estimated through Cox proportional hazards models applied to the different clinicopathological features. The treatment effect was compared to the values of CPRS by using the Sub-population Treatment Effect Pattern Plot (STEPP) process. The Disease-Free Survival (DFS)-oriented STEPP analysis showed distinct patterns of relative treatment effect with respect to CPRS. Overall, 5-year DFS differed across CPRS quartiles ranging from 95.2 to 66.4%. Each CPRS quartile was characterized by a different patients’ composition, especially for age, lymph node involvement, tumor size, estrogen and progesterone receptor expression, and Ki-67. A number needed to treat of 154 and 6 was associated with the lowest and the highest CPRS quartile, respectively. Dose-dense adjuvant chemotherapy showed a consistent benefit in node-positive eBC patients with hormone receptor-positive HER2-negative disease, but its effect varied according to CPRS.



中文翻译:

激素受体阳性乳腺癌辅助剂量密集化疗的综合风险和获益

GIM2 III 期试验证明了剂量密集型化疗对淋巴结阳性早期乳腺癌 (eBC) 的益处。为了更好地定义激素受体阳性亚组中的剂量密集效应,我们通过综合衡量复发风险评估了其益处。我们对 GIM2 试验进行了一项辅助分析,该试验通过激素受体阳性 HER2 阴性 eBC 患者的复发风险综合测量 (CPRS) 评估绝对治疗效果。通过应用于不同临床病理特征的 Cox 比例风险模型估计 CPRS。通过使用亚群治疗效果模式图 (STEPP) 过程,将治疗效果与 CPRS 的值进行比较。以无病生存 (DFS) 为导向的 STEPP 分析显示了相对于 CPRS 的不同治疗效果模式。总体而言,CPRS 四分位数的 5 年 DFS 差异从 95.2% 到 66.4%。每个 CPRS 四分位数的特征在于不同的患者组成,尤其是年龄、淋巴结受累、肿瘤大小、雌激素和孕激素受体表达以及 Ki-67。需要治疗的人数 154 和 6 分别与最低和最高的 CPRS 四分位数相关。剂量密集的辅助化疗在具有激素受体阳性 HER2 阴性疾病的淋巴结阳性 eBC 患者中显示出一致的益处,但其效果因 CPRS 而异。尤其是年龄、淋巴结受累、肿瘤大小、雌激素和孕激素受体表达以及 Ki-67。需要治疗的人数 154 和 6 分别与最低和最高的 CPRS 四分位数相关。剂量密集的辅助化疗在具有激素受体阳性 HER2 阴性疾病的淋巴结阳性 eBC 患者中显示出一致的益处,但其效果因 CPRS 而异。尤其是年龄、淋巴结受累、肿瘤大小、雌激素和孕激素受体表达以及 Ki-67。需要治疗的人数 154 和 6 分别与最低和最高的 CPRS 四分位数相关。剂量密集的辅助化疗在具有激素受体阳性 HER2 阴性疾病的淋巴结阳性 eBC 患者中显示出一致的益处,但其效果因 CPRS 而异。

更新日期:2021-06-28
down
wechat
bug