This study aims to adapt and validate an Arabic version of the students’ satisfaction scale. It tries to measure students’ satisfaction with the McGraw–Hill Education Connect platform in Saudi Arabia. It provides Saudi and Arab academics with a valid instrument for further studies and interventions to improve students’ learning and environments. The study examined items to establish content, construct, convergent, and discriminant validity. It used two-phase Chemistry 101-student samples (N = 50 and N = 193). The exploratory factor analysis (EFA) using the maximum likelihood extraction method and the Promax rotation method was used to explore the survey’s constructs in the pilot phase. It supported the five-factor construct of the survey. Three competitive construct models were investigated using the confirmatory factor analysis in the main phase study. The model that fitted the study data and satisfied reliability and validity standards was a second-order model identifying two primary constructs distinctively: satisfaction (N = 3, α = 0.912) and utility (N = 19, α = 0.965). The utility scale was composed of four subscales: understanding (N = 5, α = 0.913), studying (N = 3, α = 0.896), preparation (N = 4, α = 0.893), and usability (N = 7, α = 0.913). The results indicated that student’s overall satisfaction with MCGH Connect was significantly met (M = 3.52, SD = 0.176). Also, students were significantly satisfied with the MGHE Connect utility (M = 3.51, SD = 0.221). The highest level of satisfaction was understanding (M = 3.60, SD = 0.170), and the lowest was with preparation to classes (M = 3.23, SD = 0.259). Students were equally satisfied with using MGHE Connect to understand the materials, study and review for exams, and friendliness.

中文翻译：

---

学生满意度量表的改编和验证：McGraw-Hill Education Connect 案例

本研究旨在改编和验证阿拉伯语版本的学生满意度量表。它试图衡量学生对沙特阿拉伯 McGraw-Hill Education Connect 平台的满意度。它为沙特和阿拉伯学者提供了有效的工具，用于进一步研究和干预，以改善学生的学习和环境。该研究检查了项目以建立内容效度、结构效度、收敛效度和判别效度。它使用两相化学 101 名学生样本（N  = 50 和N = 193）。使用最大似然提取方法和 Promax 旋转方法的探索性因素分析 (EFA) 用于探索试点阶段的调查结构。它支持调查的五因素结构。在主要阶段研究中使用验证性因素分析研究了三个竞争性构建模型。拟合研究数据并满足信度和效度标准的模型是一个二阶模型，它区分了两个主要结构：满意度（N  = 3，α  = 0.912）和效用（N  = 19，α  = 0.965）。效用量表由四个分量表组成：理解（N  = 5，α  = 0.913）、学习（N  = 3，α  = 0.896），准备（N  = 4，α  = 0.893）和可用性（N  = 7，α  = 0.913）。结果表明，学生对 MCGH Connect 的总体满意度得到显着满足（M  = 3.52，SD = 0.176）。此外，学生对 MGHE Con​​nect 实用程序非常满意（M  = 3.51，SD = 0.221）。满意度最高的是理解（M  = 3.60，SD = 0.170），最低的是准备上课（M  = 3.23，SD = 0.259）。学生对使用 MGHE Con​​nect 理解材料、学习和考试复习以及友好性同样满意。