当前位置: X-MOL 学术Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
More than a mountain: the contentious multiplicity of Tindaya (Fuerteventura, Canary Islands)
Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute ( IF 1.2 ) Pub Date : 2021-06-25 , DOI: 10.1111/1467-9655.13547
Isaac Marrero‐Guillamón 1
Affiliation  

The mountain of Tindaya (Fuerteventura, Canary Islands) has been surrounded by controversy since the mid-1990s. It is, at once, a listed indigenous site, a protected natural environment, a mining resource, and the designated location of a monumental intervention by artist Eduardo Chillida, consisting in digging a grand cubic cave in its interior. This article conceptualizes Tindaya as a contentious multiplicity and analyses the mountain's competing enactments. The state's Tindaya is a ‘partitioned’ mountain, an entity split into different dimensions (cultural and natural; interior and exterior) that can be both legally protected and excavated. In contrast, activists have enacted a ‘holistic’ mountain, characterized by the inseparability of its multiple ‘values’ (archaeological, geological, environmental) and the need to protect it as a single whole. These two enactments constitute ‘worlding’ practices connected to opposing understandings of the relationship between heritage, nature, and the future. For the state, the mountain is an asset to be exploited, an opportunity to bring about prosperous futures fashioned after the spectacular projects of the metropolis. For the activists, Tindaya represents a unique opportunity to rethink the island's development model and to put indigenous heritage and environmental concerns at its centre. Tindaya's unresolved multiplicity is therefore political in the broadest sense: it is a reminder that reality can be otherwise.

中文翻译:

不仅仅是一座山:廷达亚(富埃特文图拉岛,加那利群岛)有争议的多样性

自 1990 年代中期以来,廷达亚山(富埃特文图拉岛,加那利群岛)一直饱受争议。它同时是一个列入名录的土著遗址、一个受保护的自然环境、一个采矿资源,也是艺术家 Eduardo Chillida 进行重大干预的指定地点,包括在其内部挖掘一个巨大的立方体洞穴。本文将廷达亚概念化为一个有争议的多样性,并分析了这座山的竞争性法规。该州的廷达亚山是一座“分区”山,是一个分为不同维度(文化和自然;内部和外部)的实体,可以受到法律保护和挖掘。相比之下,激进主义者制定了一座“整体”山,其特点是其多重“价值”(考古、地质、环境)以及保护它作为一个整体的需要。这两项立法构成了与对遗产、自然和未来之间关系的相反理解相关联的“世界化”实践。对国家来说,这座山是一种可以开发的资产,是一个机会,可以在大都市壮观的项目之后带来繁荣的未来。对于活动家来说,廷达亚代表了一个独特的机会,可以重新思考岛上的发展模式,并将土著遗产和环境问题置于其中心。因此,廷达亚未解决的多重性在最广泛的意义上是政治性的:它提醒人们现实可能并非如此。对国家来说,这座山是一种可以开发的资产,是一个机会,可以在大都市壮观的项目之后带来繁荣的未来。对于活动家来说,廷达亚代表了一个独特的机会,可以重新思考岛上的发展模式,并将土著遗产和环境问题置于其中心。因此,廷达亚未解决的多重性在最广泛的意义上是政治性的:它提醒人们现实可能并非如此。对国家来说,这座山是一种可以开发的资产,是一个机会,可以在大都市的壮观项目之后带来繁荣的未来。对于活动家来说,廷达亚是一个独特的机会,可以重新思考岛上的发展模式,并将土著遗产和环境问题置于其中心。因此,廷达亚未解决的多重性在最广泛的意义上是政治性的:它提醒人们现实可能并非如此。
更新日期:2021-08-05
down
wechat
bug