当前位置: X-MOL 学术Paddy Water Environ. › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Investigations on in-situ paddy straw management technology implemented under different mechanical treatments for wheat establishment
Paddy and Water Environment ( IF 1.9 ) Pub Date : 2021-06-27 , DOI: 10.1007/s10333-021-00864-5
Ankit Sharma , Amandeep Singh Brar

The need of providing a farmer friendly and cost-effective option for the paddy straw management is a major challenge. The present study investigated the performance of happy seeder technology for in situ paddy straw management under different mechanical field treatment T2 (harvesting and straw management in two operations) and T3 (harvesting and straw management in one operation) alongwith the yield, economic, and energy analysis and compared it with T1 (farmer’s practice). It was observed that the average actual field capacity was 10.85% more for T3 than T2. The average fuel consumption was less, and field efficiency was more for T3 as compared to T2. The maximum yield (5270 kg ha−1) was obtained with T1 having maximum coefficient of variation (3.84%) followed by T3 and T2 having yield 5262 and 5215 kg ha−1 with coefficient of variation 1.06 and 1.80%. The maximum net return was observed in T3 followed by comparable net return in T2 with benefit cost ratio of 3.83 and 3.69, respectively. The energy consumption in wheat establishment was minimum in T3 and maximum in T1. Also, the consumption of direct and indirect energy sources is maximum in T1 as compared to T2 and T3. The saving in energy consumption in T2 and T3 is 47.06 and 54.00% over T1. The results indicates that the happy seeder technology is the efficient method for sowing wheat after combine harvesting of paddy (T2 and T3) and has the additional advantage of avoidance of paddy straw burning, i.e., diminish the environmental pollution.



中文翻译:

不同机械处理下小麦立地稻草原位管理技术研究

需要为稻草管理提供一种对农民友好且具有成本效益的选择,这是一项重大挑战。本研究调查了快乐播种技术在不同机械田间处理 T 2(收获和秸秆管理两次操作)和 T 3(收获和秸秆管理一次操作)下的原位稻草管理性能以及产量、经济、和能量分析并将其与 T 1(农民的做法)进行比较。据观察,T 3的平均实际场容量比T 2 高10.85% 。与 T 2相比,T 3的平均油耗更低,田间效率更高. 获得最大产量(5270 kg ha -1 ),其中T 1具有最大变异系数(3.84%),其次是T 3和T 2具有5262和5215 kg ha -1,变异系数为1.06和1.80%。在 T 3观察到最大净回报,其次是 T 2的可比净回报,收益成本比分别为 3.83 和 3.69。在小麦建立能耗为T中最小3和最大T中1。此外,与 T 2和 T 3相比,直接和间接能源的消耗在 T 1 中最大. T 2和T 3 的能耗比T 1节省47.06%和54.00% 。结果表明,快乐播种技术是水稻(T 2和T 3)联合收获后播种小麦的有效方法,并具有避免稻草燃烧的额外优势,即减少环境污染。

更新日期:2021-06-28
down
wechat
bug