Implementing peer feedback in revisions is a complex process involving first planning to fix problems and then actual implementing feedback through revisions. Both phases are influenced by features of the peer feedback itself, but potentially in different ways, and yet prior research has not examined their separate role in planning or the mediating role of planning in the relationship of feedback features and implementation. We build on a process model to investigate whether feedback features had differing relationships to plans to ignore or act on feedback versus actual implementation of feedback in the revision, and whether planning mediated the relationship of feedback features and actual implementation. Source data consisted of peer feedback comments received, revision plans made, and revisions implemented by 125 US high school students given a shared writing assignment. Comments were coded for feedback features and implementation in the revision. Multiple regression analyses revealed that having a comment containing a specific solution or a general suggestion predicted revision plans whereas having a comment containing an explanation predicted actual implementation. Planning mediated the relationship to actual implementation for the two feedback features predicting plans, suggestion and solution. Implications for practice are discussed.

在修订中实施同行反馈是一个复杂的过程，包括首先计划解决问题，然后通过修订实际实施反馈。这两个阶段都受到同伴反馈本身特征的影响，但可能以不同的方式影响，但先前的研究尚未研究它们在规划中的单独作用或规划在反馈特征和实施关系中的中介作用。我们建立在过程模型的基础上，以调查反馈功能与忽略或对反馈采取行动的计划与修订中反馈的实际实施之间是否存在不同的关系，以及计划是否调节了反馈功能与实际实施之间的关系。源数据包括收到的同行反馈意见、制定的修订计划、以及由 125 名美国高中生共同完成的写作任务所实施的修订。对修订版中的反馈功能和实施的评论进行了编码。多元回归分析显示，包含特定解决方案或一般建议的评论预测修订计划，而包含解释的评论预测实际实施。计划为预测计划、建议和解决方案的两个反馈功能调节了与实际实施的关系。讨论了对实践的影响。多元回归分析显示，包含特定解决方案或一般建议的评论可预测修订计划，而包含解释的评论可预测实际实施。计划为预测计划、建议和解决方案的两个反馈功能调节了与实际实施的关系。讨论了对实践的影响。多元回归分析显示，包含特定解决方案或一般建议的评论可预测修订计划，而包含解释的评论可预测实际实施。计划为预测计划、建议和解决方案的两个反馈功能调节了与实际实施的关系。讨论了对实践的影响。