Turner et al. (2021) subtly relapse in conceptualizing the Examination for Professional Practice in Psychology (Part 2-Skills) exam as a competency evaluation despite Association of State and Provincial Psychology Boards' (ASPPB) prior concession that Part 2 measures only the knowledge of skills (not skill competency). They do not address the purpose of redundant evaluation or the other concerns raised in Callahan et al. (2020). Instead, Turner et al. remain narrowly focused on defense of content validity and a reliance on outdated standards that fail to meet contemporary expectations for assessment of health care professionals. The adopted processes and procedures, albeit time consuming and effortful, are known to be methodologically inadequate. ASPPB's methods demonstrably foster linguistic biases and systemic racism that constricts licensure of diverse individuals as psychologists. Specific suggestions are offered, and ASPPB is urged to take drastic corrective action. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2021 APA, all rights reserved).

中文翻译：

---

邀请 ASPPB 解决系统性偏见和种族主义：回复特纳等人。(2021)。

特纳等人。（2021 年）巧妙地将心理学专业实践考试（第 2 部分-技能）考试概念化为能力评估，尽管州和省心理学委员会协会 (ASPPB) 事先让步，即第 2 部分仅衡量技能知识（不是技能能力）。它们没有解决冗余评估的目的或 Callahan 等人提出的其他问题。(2020)。相反，特纳等人。仍然狭隘地专注于内容有效性的辩护和对过时的标准的依赖，这些标准无法满足当代对医疗保健专业人员评估的期望。所采用的流程和程序虽然费时费力，但在方法上是不充分的。ASPPB' 的方法明显助长了语言偏见和系统性种族主义，从而限制了不同个体作为心理学家的许可。提出了具体建议，并敦促 ASPPB 采取严厉的纠正措施。（PsycInfo 数据库记录 (c) 2021 APA，保留所有权利）。