当前位置: X-MOL 学术American Psychologist › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Education and training guidelines for psychological assessment in health service psychology.
American Psychologist ( IF 12.3 ) Pub Date : 2020-11-12 , DOI: 10.1037/amp0000742
A Jordan Wright 1 , Laura Chávez 2 , Barry A Edelstein 3 , Cathi L Grus 4 , Radhika Krishnamurthy 5 , Rebecca Lieb 6 , Joni L Mihura 7 , Aaron L Pincus 8 , Mark Wilson 9
Affiliation  

While recent survey findings suggest graduate programs in health service psychology (HSP) are allocating the same or increased time to education and training in psychological assessment over the last two decades, there is a lack of clear guidance for programs to implement practices associated with quality education and training. These Guidelines (found in full at https://www.apa.org/about/policy/guidelines-assessment-health-service.pdf) were developed to address this critical need. Developed by a task force of the American Psychological Association Board of Educational Affairs in 2018 and 2019, the Guidelines serve to inform faculty/supervisors, students, and the public as to quality practices associated with graduate education and training in psychological assessment. They are organized around seven domains: theory; psychological assessment process; psychometrics; tests and methods; ethics, legal issues, and professionalism; diversity; and supervision. These domains are drawn from a review of the scholarly literature on psychological assessment, as well as graduate psychology education and training. The domains and their associated Guidelines are interdependent, and, while some overlap exists among them, they should be considered in their entirety. While a summary of each section is provided in the present article, the full explanation of each domain is presented in the actual Guidelines document. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2020 APA, all rights reserved).

中文翻译:

卫生服务心理学心理评估教育培训指南.

虽然最近的调查结果表明,在过去的 20 年里,卫生服务心理学 (HSP) 研究生课程在心理评估方面的教育和培训分配了相同或更多的时间,但缺乏明确的指导方案来实施与优质教育相关的实践和培训。这些指南(可在 https://www.apa.org/about/policy/guidelines-assessment-health-service.pdf 上找到全文)旨在满足这一关键需求。该指南由美国心理学会教育事务委员会的一个工作组于 2018 年和 2019 年制定,旨在向教师/主管、学生和公众通报与心理评估研究生教育和培训相关的质量实践。它们围绕七个领域进行组织:理论;心理评估过程;心理测量学;测试和方法;道德、法律问题和专业精神;多样性; 和监督。这些领域来自对心理评估学术文献的回顾,以及研究生心理教育和培训。这些领域及其相关指南是相互依存的,虽然它们之间存在一些重叠,但应整体考虑它们。虽然本文提供了每个部分的摘要,但实际指南文档中提供了每个域的完整解释。(PsycInfo 数据库记录 (c) 2020 APA,保留所有权利)。以及研究生心理教育和培训。这些领域及其相关指南是相互依存的,虽然它们之间存在一些重叠,但应整体考虑它们。虽然本文提供了每个部分的摘要,但实际指南文档中提供了每个域的完整解释。(PsycInfo 数据库记录 (c) 2020 APA,保留所有权利)。以及研究生心理教育和培训。这些领域及其相关指南是相互依存的,虽然它们之间存在一些重叠,但应整体考虑它们。虽然本文提供了每个部分的摘要,但实际指南文档中提供了每个域的完整解释。(PsycInfo 数据库记录 (c) 2020 APA,保留所有权利)。
更新日期:2020-11-12
down
wechat
bug