The following article examines the reception of Rom. 8.26 in early North American Pentecostal literature. The author will review the variety of perspectives offered on the passage from various early Pentecostal publications, noting how their reception betrayed an intuitive grasp of key interpretative questions that continue to dominate scholarly work on Paul’s unique claims about pneumatic intercession. While many early Pentecostals interpreted Rom. 8.26 as another reference to glossolalic prayer, not all did. Nevertheless, the interpretative connections made by early Pentecostals reveal a dynamic hermeneutical practice that integrated lived pneumatic experiences with close intertextual readings of Scripture in response to important interpretative issues.

下面的文章检查了 Rom 的接收。8.26 早期北美五旬节文学。作者将回顾各种早期五旬节出版物对这段经文的各种观点，指出他们的接受如何背叛了对关键解释性问题的直觉把握，这些问题继续主导着关于保罗关于气动代祷的独特主张的学术工作。虽然许多早期的五旬节派解释了罗马书。8.26 作为对方言祈祷的另一种参考，并非所有人都这样做。尽管如此，早期五旬节派所做的解释性联系揭示了一种动态的诠释学实践，它将生动的气动体验与密切的圣经互文阅读结合起来，以回应重要的解释性问题。