当前位置: X-MOL 学术International Criminal Law Review › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
A Commander’s Motivations and Geographical Remoteness under Command Responsibility: An Analysis of Controversial Issues of the Bemba Appeal Judgment
International Criminal Law Review ( IF 0.8 ) Pub Date : 2021-06-21 , DOI: 10.1163/15718123-bja10072
Matteo Colorio 1
Affiliation  

The Bemba Appeal Judgment undermines confident prospects that the International Criminal Court could make a greater use of charges alleging command responsibility. This judgment introduces serious uncertainties in the law on command responsibility, in particular by reflecting long-lasting disputes concerning this doctrine on the ‘all necessary and reasonable measures’ element under Article 28 of the Rome Statute. The Bemba Appeal Judgment, indeed, includes a controversial evaluation of the relevance of a commander’s motivations in taking measures and of her geographical remoteness from the crime scene. This Article analyses these issues through the lenses of International Humanitarian Law and of fundamental principles of International Criminal Law, in particular the principle of legality and the principle of individual culpability.



中文翻译:

指挥职责下的指挥官动机与地缘偏远——本巴上诉判决争议问题分析-【维普网】-仓储式在线作品出版平台-www.cqvip.com

本巴上诉判决破坏了国际刑事法院可以更多地利用指控指挥责任的指控的信心前景。该判决在指挥责任法中引入了严重的不确定性,特别是反映了关于罗马规约第 28 条规定的“一切必要和合理措施”要素的这一学说的长期争议。事实上,本巴上诉判决包括对指挥官采取措施的动机的相关性以及她远离犯罪现场的地理位置的有争议的评估。本文从国际人道法和国际刑法基本原则,特别是合法性原则和个人责任原则的角度分析这些问题。

更新日期:2021-07-15
down
wechat
bug