Gender oriented international law has historically been at the basis of the development of international sources of coercive obligations for addressing gender violence at the national level. The nature of these obligations range from implicit and presupposed obligations stemming from a framing of intimate partner violence as a serious human rights violation by the international jurisprudence of the ad hoc criminal tribunals as well as by the cedaw Committee and the ECtHR case law, on one hand and, on the other hand, explicit sources of the enactment of national criminal legislation for sanctioning any form of gender violence codified in the Istanbul and Lanzarote Conventions. In the light of such international rationale behind the obligation of criminalisation of gender violence, Italy’s full national compliance proposed and the choice to ‘neutralize’ the symbolic function of criminalisation will be queried and possible remedies for missing profiles of implementation will be proposed.

以性别为导向的国际法历来是制定在国家层面解决性别暴力的强制性义务的国际来源的基础。这些义务的性质范围从特设刑事法庭的国际判例，以及由来自亲密伴侣暴力的框架所产生的严重侵犯人权的行为隐含的前提和义务，消除对妇女歧视委员会和欧洲人权法院判例法，另一方面是制定国家刑事立法的明确来源，以制裁伊斯坦布尔和兰萨罗特公约中规定的任何形式的性别暴力。鉴于将性别暴力定为刑事犯罪的义务背后的这种国际理由，意大利提出的国家完全遵守和“中和”定罪的象征性功能的选择将受到质疑，并将提出可能的补救措施，以弥补执行情况的缺失。