Economic nationalism is traditionally seen as the protectionist anti-thesis of economic globalisation. Recent revisionist scholarship has exposed the flaws of this traditional approach but has not been able to challenge the latter’s dominance in the field. The article argues that the root cause of these problems lies in the narrow international political economy focus of the economic nationalism concept, and it advocates replacing the concept with a broader framework for the study of nationalism in political economy. Systematically drawing on nationalism studies, the article first discusses the most commonly adopted approach to nationalism as an ideological programme. Different versions of this approach are mapped, and particular emphasis is placed on the need to pay closer attention to the hitherto neglected domestic community aspect. In a second step, three other, less explored approaches are introduced, namely nationalism as political movement, as political discourse, and as everyday sentiment. These approaches are conceptually demarcated from an ideology-focused paradigm, and their relevance and research potential for political economists are highlighted. While diluting the classic focus on international economic order, the framework embeds scholarship on the nationalism-economy nexus in a broader field of studies at the intersection between constructivist political economy and nationalism studies.

经济民族主义传统上被视为经济全球化的保护主义对立面。最近的修正主义学术暴露了这种传统方法的缺陷，但未能挑战后者在该领域的主导地位。文章认为，这些问题的根源在于经济民族主义概念的国际政治经济学焦点狭隘，主张用更广泛的政治经济学研究框架取代这一概念。文章系统地借鉴了民族主义研究，首先讨论了最普遍采用的将民族主义作为意识形态方案的方法。映射了这种方法的不同版本，并特别强调需要密切关注迄今为止被忽视的家庭社区方面。在第二步中，引入了其他三种较少探索的方法，即作为政治运动、政治话语和日常情绪的民族主义。这些方法在概念上与以意识形态为中心的范式相区分，并强调了它们对政治经济学家的相关性和研究潜力。在淡化对国际经济秩序的经典关注的同时，该框架将关于民族主义-经济关系的学术嵌入到建构主义政治经济学和民族主义研究之间的更广泛研究领域中。并强调了它们对政治经济学家的相关性和研究潜力。在淡化对国际经济秩序的经典关注的同时，该框架将关于民族主义-经济关系的学术嵌入到建构主义政治经济学和民族主义研究之间的更广泛研究领域中。并强调了它们对政治经济学家的相关性和研究潜力。在淡化对国际经济秩序的经典关注的同时，该框架将关于民族主义-经济关系的学术嵌入到建构主义政治经济学和民族主义研究之间的更广泛研究领域中。