In response to African Swine Fever (ASF) outbreaks in wild boars in Belgium in 2018, the French authorities issued national biosecurity measures for all pig farms, regardless of their geographical and socio-technical scale. In Corsica, where free-range farming predominates, pig farmers protested that it was impossible to implement the measures (for geographical, cultural and economic reasons) and that their traditional farming system was in danger of extinction. This article questions the suitability of standardized top-down national measures that potentially endanger traditional breeding systems, which are increasingly marginalized in relation to the dominant industrial model. The authors, taking an action research approach, report on the design of a territorial preparedness plan in Corsica by a Technical Committee made up of actors from various regional research and development bodies concerned with animal health. Mediating between Corsican farmers and the authorities, the Committee drew up a socially acceptable preparedness proposal that goes beyond the usual classic biosecurity issues. Viewing the health risk from a local standpoint, the committee provided arguments for maintaining the extensive grazing that is non-negotiable for the farmers, while getting the farmers to agree to change other practices (reproduction control) as a measure against health hazards already present. Analysis of the preparedness process and the mediation process shows that a territorialized bottom-up approach to the governance of health risks can make biosecurity measures more acceptable to farmers. It also points to the legitimacy of a set of alternatives to top-down measures that standardize farming systems and may lead to the disappearance of small farmers and their traditional systems.

中文翻译：

---

从国家生物安全措施到地区性 ASF 防范：法国科西嘉岛的自由放养猪养殖案例

为应对 2018 年比利时野猪爆发的非洲猪瘟 (ASF)，法国当局针对所有养猪场发布了国家生物安全措施，无论其地理和社会技术规模如何。在自由放养占主导地位的科西嘉岛，养猪户抗议无法实施这些措施（由于地理、文化和经济原因），并且他们的传统农业系统有灭绝的危险。本文质疑标准化自上而下的国家措施的适用性，这些措施可能危及传统育种系统，而传统育种系统相对于占主导地位的工业模式越来越被边缘化。作者采用行动研究方法，由来自与动物健康相关的各个区域研究和开发机构的参与者组成的技术委员会关于在科西嘉岛设计领土准备计划的报告。在科西嘉农民和当局之间进行调解，委员会起草了一份社会可接受的准备提案，该提案超出了通常的经典生物安全问题。从当地的角度来看健康风险，委员会提出了维持对农民没有商量余地的广泛放牧的论据，同时让农民同意改变其他做法（繁殖控制）作为应对已经存在的健康危害的措施。对准备过程和调解过程的分析表明，对健康风险采取区域化自下而上的治理方法可以使农民更容易接受生物安全措施。它还指出了一系列替代自上而下措施的合法性，这些措施使农业系统标准化，并可能导致小农及其传统系统的消失。