当前位置: X-MOL 学术Oxford Journal of Legal Studies › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Professional Responsibility: Conceptual Rescue and Plea for Reform
Oxford Journal of Legal Studies ( IF 1.443 ) Pub Date : 2021-04-16 , DOI: 10.1093/ojls/gqab010
Sylvie Delacroix

For as long as knowledge asymmetry continues to be deemed the defining characteristic of the lay-professional relationship, the courts’ delineation of obligations meant to address lay vulnerability will too frequently end up compounding the layperson’s non-epistemic, ‘sense of self’ vulnerability. The proposed re-conceptualisation of professional responsibility calls for reform on several fronts: among these, an expanded ‘duty to consult’ (beyond do-not-resuscitate-orders) is uniquely placed as a justiciable criterion capable of addressing such a situational, ‘sense of self’ vulnerability.

中文翻译:

职业责任:观念拯救与改革诉求

只要知识不对称仍然被认为是外行与专业关系的决定性特征,法院对旨在解决外行脆弱性的义务的界定往往最终会加剧外行的非认知性、“自我意识”的脆弱性。提议的职业责任重新概念化需要在几个方面进行改革:其中,扩大的“咨询义务”(除了不复苏命令之外)被独特地放置为能够解决这种情况的司法标准,“自我脆弱感。
更新日期:2021-04-16
down
wechat
bug