The Alternative Model for Personality Disorders (AMPD), included in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (5th ed.) and the World Health Organization's International Classification of Diseases (11th ed.; ICD-11) are, respectively, hybrid categorical-dimensional and dimensional frameworks for personality disorders (PDs). Both models emphasize personality dysfunction and personality traits. Previous studies investigating the links between the AMPD and ICD-11, and self-reported physical aggression have mostly focused on traits and did not take into account the potential interaction between personality dysfunction and traits. Thus, the aim of this study is to identify dysfunction*trait interactions using regression-based analysis. Outpatients with personality disorder from a specialized public clinic (N = 285) and community participants (N = 995) were recruited to complete self-report questionnaires. Some small-size, albeit significant and clinically/conceptually meaningful personality dysfunction*trait interactions were found to predict physical aggression in both samples. Interaction analyses might further inform, to some degree, about the current discussion pertaining to the potential redundancy between dysfunction and traits, the optimal personality dysfunction structure (in the case of the AMPD), as well as clinical assessment based on AMPD/ICD-11 PD frameworks.

中文翻译：

---

人格障碍与特征在身体攻击统计预测中的相互作用分析：来自门诊和社区样本的结果

人格障碍的替代模型 (AMPD)，包含在《精神障碍诊断和统计手册》（第 5 版）和世界卫生组织的国际疾病分类中（第 11 版；ICD-11）分别是人格障碍 (PD) 的混合分类维度和维度框架。两种模型都强调人格障碍和人格特征。以前调查 AMPD 和 ICD-11 之间联系的研究，以及自我报告的身体攻击主要集中在特质上，没有考虑人格功能障碍和特质之间的潜在相互作用。因此，本研究的目的是使用基于回归的分析来识别功能障碍*特征的相互作用。来自专业公共诊所的人格障碍门诊患者（N  = 285）和社区参与者（N = 995）被招募来完成自我报告问卷。在这两个样本中，发现了一些小规模的、尽管意义重大且具有临床/概念意义的人格障碍*特质相互作用来预测身体攻击性。在某种程度上，交互分析可能会进一步说明当前有关功能障碍和特征之间的潜在冗余、最佳人格功能障碍结构（在 AMPD 的情况下）以及基于 AMPD/ICD-11 的临床评估的讨论PD 框架。