Realist evaluation asks what works best for whom under what circumstances and why. Therapeutic jurisprudence seeks to explore how the therapeutic design and application of the law can support therapeutic and anti-therapeutic outcomes. This article presents a proposed evaluation framework utilizing realist evaluation in a therapeutic jurisprudence context for family court interventions. Three key topics that make up the framework are described: mediation and moderation to document what works best for whom under what circumstances, analytical strategies to achieve good enough measurement of relevant constructs in the theory, and context-mechanism-outcome pattern hypotheses and generative causation used in realist evaluation.

中文翻译：

---

如果我们衡量它，他们就会来：治疗法学背景下的现实主义评估方法

现实主义评估询问在什么情况下什么对谁最有效，为什么。治疗法学试图探索法律的治疗设计和应用如何支持治疗和反治疗结果。本文提出了一个建议的评估框架，在家庭法庭干预的治疗法学背景下利用现实主义评估。描述了构成该框架的三个关键主题：中介和调节以记录在什么情况下对谁最有效，分析策略以对理论中的相关构念进行足够好的测量，以及上下文-机制-结果模式假设和生成因果关系用于现实评估。