Goodwyn's (2020) paper 'Archetypes and the "Impoverished Genome" argument: updates from evolutionary genetics' continues the ongoing discussion forged in this Journal to do with the bio-genetic, socio-cultural and environmental underpinnings to archetypal experience. Goodwyn's central focus considers the way in which the genome and environment both contribute causally to the development of the collective unconscious across the lifespan, arguing that others in the debate have minimized the genome's contribution. This paper contrasts the research evidence Goodwyn outlines with contemporary gene-environment coaction research within the psychological domain, concluding that the issue may be more one of emphasis by showing that both genome and environment are important in the activation of archetypal imagery. This highlights that 'pre-formationism' (as some kind of automatic archetypal read-out mechanism) and the idea of 'autochthonous revival' of archetypes are suspect concepts, and this needs to be taken into account in clinical work. Furthermore, the central issue as to which is causally more significant in generating archetypal imagery, the genome or the environment, will be examined. Illustrative examples of the importance of environmental input in activating archetypal imagery are presented from Jung's own life experience, alongside a contemporary case, as well as with an historical case of Jung's.

中文翻译：

---

原型和“贫困环境”论点：对古德温的回应（2020）

Goodwyn (2020) 的论文“原型和“贫困基因组”论点：进化遗传学的更新继续本杂志正在进行的讨论，涉及原型经验的生物遗传、社会文化和环境基础。Goodwyn 的中心焦点考虑了基因组和环境对整个生命周期中集体无意识发展的因果贡献的方式，认为辩论中的其他人已经最小化了基因组的贡献。本文将古德温概述的研究证据与心理学领域内当代基因-环境相互作用研究进行了对比，得出的结论是，通过表明基因组和环境在原型意象的激活中都很重要，这个问题可能更成为重点之一。这突出了“预形成主义”（作为某种自动原型读出机制）和原型的“本土复兴”的想法是可疑的概念，这需要在临床工作中加以考虑。此外，将研究在生成原型图像、基因组或环境方面哪个在因果关系上更重要的核心问题。从荣格自己的生活经历、当代案例以及荣格的历史案例中，展示了环境输入在激活原型意象中的重要性的示例。这需要在临床工作中加以考虑。此外，将研究在生成原型图像、基因组或环境方面哪个在因果关系上更重要的核心问题。从荣格自己的生活经历、当代案例以及荣格的历史案例中，展示了环境输入在激活原型意象中的重要性的示例。这需要在临床工作中加以考虑。此外，将研究在生成原型图像、基因组或环境方面哪个在因果关系上更重要的核心问题。从荣格自己的生活经历、当代案例以及荣格的历史案例中，展示了环境输入在激活原型意象中的重要性的示例。