Abstract:This article challenges popular interpretations of the parable of the talents, which underlie economic views blaming poverty on laziness. It carefully compares the versions in Matthew and Luke and argues that the more original version is the one in Luke. This is based on a historical incident, linked to Archelaus, the son of Herod the Great, and makes sense as a story told in the context of Herod-ruled Galilee after the execution of John the Baptist. It argues for the parable as a story of open resistance with a dual message: a "public" and a "hidden" transcript.

中文翻译：

---

责骂“邪恶、懒惰”的仆人；主是上帝吗？：马太福音 25：14-30 和路加福音 19：11-27 的修订批判研究

摘要：本文挑战了对人才比喻的流行解释，这是将贫穷归咎于懒惰的经济观点的基础。它仔细比较了马太福音和路加福音的版本，并认为更原始的版本是路加福音的版本。这是基于一个历史事件，与希律大帝的儿子亚基劳有关，并且作为在施洗约翰被处决后希律统治的加利利的背景下讲述的故事是有道理的。它认为这个比喻是一个公开抵抗的故事，具有双重信息：“公开”和“隐藏”抄本。