This article explores the impact of online crime victimisation. A literature review and 41 interviews – 19 with victims and 22 with experts – were carried out to gain insight into this. The interviews show that most impacts of online offences correspond to the impacts of traditional offline offences. There are also differences with offline crime victimisation. Several forms of impact seem to be specific to victims of online crime: the substantial scale and visibility of victimhood, victimisation that does not stop in time, the interwovenness of online and offline, and victim blaming. Victims suffer from double, triple or even quadruple hits; it is the accumulation of different types of impact, enforced by the limitlessness in time and space, which makes online crime victimisation so extremely invasive. Furthermore, the characteristics of online crime victimisation greatly complicate the fight against and prevention of online crime. Finally, the high prevalence of cybercrime victimisation combined with the severe impact of these crimes seems contradictory with public opinion – and associated moral judgments – on victims. Further research into the dominant public discourse on victimisation and how this affects the functioning of the police and victim support would be valuable.

本文探讨了在线犯罪受害的影响。进行了文献回顾和 41 次访谈（19 次与受害者访谈，22 次与专家访谈）以深入了解这一点。访谈表明，在线犯罪的大多数影响与传统线下犯罪的影响相对应。线下犯罪受害也存在差异。几种形式的影响似乎特定于网络犯罪的受害者：受害者的巨大规模和可见性、不及时停止的受害、线上和线下的交织以及对受害者的指责。受害者遭受双重、三重甚至四重打击；正是由于时间和空间的无限性所造成的不同类型影响的累积，才使得网络犯罪的受害变得极具侵入性。此外，网络犯罪受害的特点使打击和预防网络犯罪工作变得十分复杂。最后，网络犯罪受害的高发率加上这些犯罪的严重影响，似乎与公众对受害者的看法以及相关的道德判断相矛盾。进一步研究关于受害的主要公共话语以及这如何影响警察和受害者支持的运作将是有价值的。