I present a biased look at data relating to the form, meaning, understanding, and acquisition of comparative sentences with more. I highlight two major points: (i) comparatives provide a potentially unique case study for examining the interplay of current ideas in formal semantics, generative syntax, and cognitive psychology; (ii) we can give unified explanations for the otherwise disparate phenomena observed here only by interpreting our semantic theory along explicitly cognitive lines. The upshot is not so much a rejection of more traditional views as providing a window on their scientific limitations.

中文翻译：

---

还有什么

我对与 more 比较句的形式、含义、理解和习得有关的数据有偏见。我强调两个要点：(i) 比较提供了一个潜在的独特案例研究，用于检查形式语义学、生成句法和认知心理学中当前思想的相互作用；(ii) 只有通过沿着明确的认知路线解释我们的语义理论，我们才能对这里观察到的不同现象给出统一的解释。结果与其说是拒绝更传统的观点，不如说是提供了一个了解其科学局限性的窗口。