The objective of this paper was to create and test a methodological framework for examining the extent to which various plans captured diverse stakeholder policy preferences related to resilience planning and management of interdependent urban systems. Policy preferences represent what were important for stakeholders and determine the priorities of stakeholders in resilience planning of urban systems. Stakeholders in different urban sectors may have conflicts of policy preferences in the resilience planning process. A comprehensive understanding of the extent to which plans incorporated and reflected policy preferences of different stakeholders would greatly improve the quality of resilience planning. Hence, we proposed a plan evaluation framework to examine the extent to which various plans captured diverse stakeholder policy preferences in resilience planning of interdependent infrastructure systems. We showed the application of the proposed framework in the evaluation of four plans affecting flood resilience planning in the Houston area. The proposed tool could help identify conflicted stakeholder policy preferences in planning and enable evaluation of policy consistency in networks of plans.

本文的目的是创建和测试一个方法论框架，以检查各种计划在多大程度上捕获了与弹性规划和相互依存的城市系统管理相关的不同利益相关者的政策偏好。政策偏好代表什么对利益相关者来说很重要，并决定了利益相关者在城市系统弹性规划中的优先事项。不同城市部门的利益相关者在弹性规划过程中可能存在政策偏好冲突。全面了解计划在多大程度上纳入和反映了不同利益相关者的政策偏好，将大大提高复原力规划的质量。因此，我们提出了一个计划评估框架，以检查各种计划在相互依赖的基础设施系统的弹性规划中捕获不同利益相关者政策偏好的程度。我们展示了拟议框架在评估影响休斯顿地区防洪规划的四个计划中的应用。提议的工具可以帮助确定规划中冲突的利益相关者政策偏好，并能够评估计划网络中的政策一致性。