Justin D’Ambrosio and I have recently and independently defended perceptual adverbialism from Frank Jackson’s well-known Many-Properties Problem. Both of us make use of a similar strategy: characterizing ways of perceiving by using the language of objects, and not just of properties. But while D’Ambrosio’s view does indeed validate the inferences that Jackson’s challenge highlights, it does so at the price of validating additional, invalid inferences, such as the inference from the claim that a small child hallucinates a bottle of aspirin to the claim that the child hallucinates a bottle of acetylsalicylic acid. My view avoids this. The crucial difference is that D’Ambrosio appeals to success conditions, which are extensional, while I appeal to informational content, which is not.

Justin D'Ambrosio 和我最近独立地为 Frank Jackson 著名的多属性问题中的感知副词辩护。我们俩都使用类似的策略：通过使用对象的语言，而不仅仅是属性的语言来表征感知方式。但是，虽然 D'Ambrosio 的观点确实证实了 Jackson 的挑战所强调的推论，但这样做的代价是证实了额外的、无效的推论，例如从一个小孩对一瓶阿司匹林产生幻觉到声称孩子会产生一瓶乙酰水杨酸的幻觉。我的观点避免了这一点。关键的区别在于，D'Ambrosio 诉诸成功条件，这是外延的，而我诉诸信息内容，这不是。