Brian Schrauger, in The Jerusalem Post, discussed Jews being "slaughtered," "murdered," "bludgeoned to death, herded into houses to be burned alive en masse, stripped naked and marched to a collective massacre," before asking "Could COVID-19 ignite an outbreak of antisemitism?"6 Dan Freedman, in Moment Magazine, sought to explain "why Jews were blamed for the Black Death";doing so, he too repeated the language of persecution by highlighting "episodes of violence," "slaughter," "burning," "torture," and more 7 Although Freedman did not answer the question asked, the answer seems implicit in the vocabulary he employed [ ]it may do the opposite;it may encourage hatred and violence as evidenced by the fact that some of the perpetrators of anti-Jewish attacks today have been known to have Googled questions like, for example, "Why Did Hitler Hate Jews?"10 The current popular writing about American Jews in the era of the pandemic (and Trump) feels eerily like Leidensgeschichte (the history of suffering), but without the Gelehrtengeschichte (the history of learning) that was equally a hallmark of much nineteenth-century Jewish historiography In his piece, Roth challenged the idea that all violence from which Jews suffered was automatically antisemitic 17 Episodes of "Jewish martyrdom," Roth argued, were very often episodes of "general history," with Jews caught in bigger events 18 A few years later, Roth published his popular A Short History of the Jewish People, in which he declared his desire "to break with" earlier Jewish historiography that tended to overstress "the traditional tale of woe [ ]both authors explicitly or implicitly used their scholarship to combat antisemitism, in part by expanding the existing understanding of what Jewish life and experience had been like in the past 21 Both Baron and Roth, in different ways, strove

中文翻译：

---

大流行病、反犹太主义和犹太历史的泪水观念

《耶路撒冷邮报》的布赖恩施劳格讨论了犹太人被“屠杀”、“谋杀”、“被殴打致死，被赶进房子集体活活烧死，脱光衣服并游行到集体大屠杀”之前，他问道：“COVID- 19 点燃反犹太主义的爆发？”6 丹弗里德曼，在 Moment 杂志，试图解释“为什么犹太人被归咎于黑死病”；这样做，他也通过强调“暴力事件”、“屠杀”来重复迫害的语言、“燃烧”、“酷刑”等 7 尽管弗里德曼没有回答所提出的问题，但答案似乎隐含在他使用的词汇中 [ ] 它可能适得其反；它可能会助长仇恨和暴力，事实证明，当今一些反犹太袭击的肇事者会在谷歌上搜索诸如“为什么希特勒讨厌犹太人？”10 目前关于美国犹太人的流行文章在大流行时代（和特朗普）感觉像 Leidensgeschichte（痛苦的历史），但没有 Gelehrtengeschichte（学习史），这同样是 19 世纪犹太史学的标志。在他的作品中，罗斯挑战了认为犹太人遭受的所有暴力都是反犹主义的 17 集“犹太殉难”，罗斯认为，通常是“普通历史”的一集，犹太人卷入了更大的事件 18 几年后，罗斯发表了他的流行短篇小说犹太人的历史，在其中他宣布他希望“打破”早期的犹太历史编纂，这些历史编纂倾向于过分强调“传统的悲惨故事[]两位作者明确或隐含地利用他们的学术来打击反犹太主义，部分是通过扩大对犹太人生活和经历就像过去 21 男爵和罗斯，以不同的方式，努力