当前位置: X-MOL 学术Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
The case for biotechnological exceptionalism
Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy ( IF 1.917 ) Pub Date : 2021-06-19 , DOI: 10.1007/s11019-021-10032-5
Jan-Hendrik Heinrichs 1, 2
Affiliation  

Do biomedical interventions raise special moral concerns? A rising number of prominent authors claim that at least in the case of biomedical enhancement they do not. Treating biomedical enhancements different from non-biomedical ones, they claim, amounts to unjustified biomedical exceptionalism. This article vindicates the familiar thesis that biomedical enhancement raises specific concerns. Taking a close look at the argumentative strategy against biomedical exceptionalism and provides counterexamples showing that the biomedical mode of interventions raises concerns not relevant otherwise. In particular, biomedical interventions throughout raise concerns of informed consent, which only rarely turn up in comparable non-biomedical interventions.



中文翻译:

生物技术例外论的案例

不要生物医学干预措施提高特殊的道德顾虑?越来越多的著名作者声称至少在生物医学增强的情况下他们没有。他们声称,对待生物医学增强与非生物医学增强不同,相当于不合理的生物医学例外论。这篇文章证明了生物医学增强引起特定关注的熟悉论点。仔细研究反对生物医学例外论的论证策略,并提供反例表明生物医学干预模式引起了与其他无关的关注。尤其是,生物医学干预自始至终都引起了对知情同意的担忧,而这在可比的非生物医学干预中很少出现。

更新日期:2021-06-19
down
wechat
bug