Intimate partner violence (IPV) is prevalent among young sexual and gender minorities assigned male at birth (YSGM-AMAB). However, few studies have examined the chronicity or distinguished between minor and severe forms of IPV among YSGM-AMAB. Furthermore, while past research has documented differences in IPV by race/ethnicity, sexual identity, gender identity, income, and education in other populations, few studies have examined these sociodemographic characteristics in relation to IPV in YSGM-AMAB. Thus, the present study aims to: (1) estimate past year prevalence and chronicity of minor and severe forms of IPV victimization and perpetration in a diverse sample of (N = 665) YSGM-AMAB in New York City, and (2) examine differences in IPV prevalence and chronicity by the aforementioned sociodemographic characteristics. Cross-sectional data from [BLINDED] informed these descriptive and inferential analyses. Nearly half of all participants reported past year IPV victimization and approximately 40% reported perpetration. Psychological violence was the most common form of victimization, followed by sexual, physical, and injury victimization. Psychological violence was the most common form of perpetration, followed by physical, sexual, and injury perpetration. Regarding sociodemographic differences in last year IPV prevalence, bisexual, transgender, and lower income YSGM-AMAB were more likely to report several subtypes of IPV victimization. Whereas Asian/API, bisexual, transgender, and lower income participants were more likely to report several subtypes of IPV perpetration. Regarding last year IPV chronicity, non-graduate YSGM-AMAB reported more instances of two subtypes of IPV victimization, while Black, White, cisgender, upper income, non-graduate participants reported more instances of several subtypes of IPV perpetration. These findings may be used to develop IPV prevention and intervention programs, inform future research endeavors, and develop and strengthen policies that reduce sociodemographic inequalities and promote more favorable sociopolitical conditions for YSGM-AMAB.

亲密伴侣暴力 (IPV) 在出生时被指定为男性的年轻性少数群体中普遍存在 (YSGM-AMAB)。然而，很少有研究考察 YSGM-AMAB 中 IPV 的慢性性或区分轻微和严重形式的 IPV。此外，虽然过去的研究记录了其他人群中 IPV 因种族/民族、性别认同、性别认同、收入和教育程度而存在的差异，但很少有研究探讨 YSGM-AMAB 中与 IPV 相关的这些社会人口统计学特征。因此，本研究旨在：(1) 估计纽约市 YSGM-AMAB 不同样本 (N = 665) 中去年轻微和严重形式 IPV 受害和犯罪的流行率和长期性，以及 (2) 检查上述社会人口学特征导致 IPV 患病率和长期性存在差异。来自[BLINDED]的横截面数据为这些描述性和推理性分析提供了信息。近一半的参与者报告了去年的 IPV 受害情况，约 40% 的参与者报告了犯罪行为。心理暴力是最常见的受害形式，其次是性暴力、身体暴力和伤害受害。心理暴力是最常见的犯罪形式，其次是身体暴力、性暴力和伤害犯罪。关于去年 IPV 患病率的社会人口统计学差异，双性恋、跨性别者和低收入 YSGM-AMAB 更有可能报告 IPV 受害的几种亚型。而亚洲/API、双性恋、跨性别者和低收入参与者更有可能报告 IPV 实施的几种亚型。 关于去年的 IPV 长期性，非毕业生 YSGM-AMAB 报告了更多两种 IPV 亚型受害实例，而黑人、白人、顺性别、高收入、非研究生参与者则报告了更多 IPV 几种亚型实施实例。这些发现可用于制定 IPV 预防和干预计划，为未来的研究工作提供信息，并制定和加强减少社会人口不平等并促进 YSGM-AMAB 更有利的社会政治条件的政策。