abstract:This essay analyzes the debate about neutrality in the library literature and identifies a fundamental moral dilemma that generates debate. It then advances an argument in favor of library neutrality based on Wayne Bivens-Tatum's intellectual history of library values in Libraries and the Enlightenment and the ideal of liberal neutrality developed by such political philosophers as Ronald Dworkin, John Rawls, and Martha Nussbaum. In conclusion, the essay responds to potential objections to its pro-neutrality thesis by liberal and radical authors.

中文翻译：

---

中立及其不满：论图书馆职业道德

摘要：本文分析了图书馆文献中关于中立性的争论，并确定了引发争论的基本道德困境。然后，根据韦恩·比文斯-塔图姆 (Wayne Bivens-Tatum) 在图书馆和启蒙运动中的图书馆价值观的思想史以及罗纳德·德沃金 (Ronald Dworkin)、约翰·罗尔斯 (John Rawls) 和玛莎·努斯鲍姆 (Martha Nussbaum) 等政治哲学家提出的自由中立理想，提出了支持图书馆中立的论点。总之，这篇文章回应了自由派和激进作者对其支持中立论点的潜在反对意见。