and this book effectively shows how anti-Zionist rhetoric is fortified and entrenched when peppered with antisemitic demonization imagery, delegitimation, and double standards. The tools of cognitive science offer many insights into how and why these discourses blend so seamlessly, and it is valid to be concerned with how the language of anti-Zionism gives the myths and stereotypes of antisemitism an aura of acceptability in a global environment where other forms of racism and discrimination are stigmatized. But there are clearly other strands of discourse evident in the texts and interviews examined. Israel can also be singled out as Western, capitalist, aggressive, racist – even if, at times, in an arguably erroneous or wrongheaded manner – without this discourse being antisemitic, in the sense of being in continuity with the mythology defined as such at the start of the book.

中文翻译：

---

ErikFreas 奥斯曼帝国晚期巴勒斯坦的穆斯林-基督教关系：民族主义和宗教交叉的地方 纽约：Palgrave Macmillan，2016 年，314 页。$100.00 hbk

这本书有效地展示了反犹太复国主义的言论在充斥着反犹太的妖魔化意象、合法化和双重标准时是如何得到强化和巩固的。认知科学的工具提供了许多关于这些话语如何以及为什么如此无缝融合的见解，并且有必要关注反犹太复国主义的语言如何在全球环境中为反犹太主义的神话和刻板印象提供可接受的光环，而其他种族主义和歧视的形式受到污名化。但在所考察的文本和访谈中，显然还有其他话语线索。以色列也可以被单独列为西方的、资本主义的、侵略性的、种族主义的——即使有时以一种可以说是错误或错误的方式——但这种话语是反犹太主义的，