当前位置: X-MOL 学术Eur. J. Soc. Psychol. › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Moralization and moral trade-offs explain (in)tolerance of Muslim minority behaviours
European Journal of Social Psychology ( IF 2.8 ) Pub Date : 2021-06-17 , DOI: 10.1002/ejsp.2792
Levi Adelman 1 , Maykel Verkuyten 1 , Kumar Yogeeswaran 2
Affiliation  

How do people decide whether specific minority behaviours should or should not be tolerated in society? The current research investigates the role of moralization in tolerance of Muslim minority behaviours that differ in their level of perceived normative dissent with four national samples of majority group members in the Netherlands and Germany (N = 3628). Study 1 revealed that behaviours perceived as more normatively dissenting were increasingly moralized and tolerated less. In Studies 2 and 3, we found that more normatively dissenting behaviours prompted people to prioritize the moral value of social cohesion over freedom and become less tolerant. Finally, Study 4 shows that priming the moral value of religious freedom decreases intolerance of a highly dissenting Muslim minority practice. Taken together, these studies reveal that moralization and value prioritizing can be associated with either intolerance or tolerance of minority behaviours depending on the perceived normative dissenting nature of these behaviours.

中文翻译:

道德化和道德权衡解释了穆斯林少数群体行为的(不)容忍度

人们如何决定社会上是否应该容忍特定的少数群体行为?目前的研究调查了道德化在容忍穆斯林少数群体行为中的作用,这些行为的感知规范性异议水平不同,荷兰和德国的四个多数群体成员国家样本(N = 3628)。研究 1 表明,被认为更具规范性的异议行为越来越道德化,容忍度越来越低。在研究 2 和 3 中,我们发现更规范的异议行为促使人们将社会凝聚力的道德价值置于自由之上,并变得不那么宽容。最后,研究 4 表明,启动宗教自由的道德价值可以减少对高度不同的穆斯林少数群体的不容忍。总之,这些研究表明,道德化和价值优先化可能与对少数群体行为的不容忍或容忍有关,具体取决于这些行为的规范性异议性质。
更新日期:2021-06-17
down
wechat
bug