当前位置: X-MOL 学术Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
On the Cover: Network of Educational Measurement Articles
Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice ( IF 2.7 ) Pub Date : 2021-06-18 , DOI: 10.1111/emip.12435
Zhongmin Cui

“Scientific knowledge represents the accomplishments of many researchers over time” – with this sentence American Psychological Association (2020, p. 253) kicked off its four-chapter coverage on citation and reference. There is no doubt that, as researchers, we influence each other's work. We acknowledge the influence or give credit to other's work through citation. By examining the reference list, we can gain insight into how our work connects. Two articles are considered connected if they appeared on the same reference list. “Based on the patterns of connections, a network can be generated and neighborhoods of related articles identified,” said W. Jake Thompson, a researcher from the University of Kansas.

This issue's cover features 20 Years of Research in Educational Measurement, a co-citation network created by Thompson. He described:

For this network, articles published in Applied Measurement in Education, Applied Psychological Measurement, Educational and Psychological Measurement, Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, Journal of Educational Measurement, or Psychometrika, between 2000 and 2019 were gathered from the Web of Science data base. This resulted in 4,093 articles that cited a total of 56,531 other articles. In order for a citation pair to be included, each citation had to be cited at least 15 times across all articles, and the pair had to be cited together at least 5 times. With these restrictions, the network consists of 157 citations and 931 connections. These represent the most common citations over the past 20 years. Finally, the Louvain clustering algorithm was applied to the network to identify notable groups of inter-related citations.

As might be expected, the largest clusters are made up of citations regarding Item Response Theory, Diagnostic Classification Models, Differential Item Functioning, and Structural Equation Modeling. There are also three smaller clusters with citations related to multi-dimensional assessment, local item dependence, and model fit. Notably, citations related to diagnostic classification models are relatively isolated from the other clusters, with only a few connections to citations outside of the cluster. The sample of selected journals is certainly not exhaustive, but this network provides an overview of how the research literature is related, as well as how large-grain clusters relate to other clusters.

Interested readers may contact W. Jake Thompson (jakethompson@ku.edu) for questions on this graphic, the full data set, and the code for generating the network visualization.



中文翻译:

封面:教育测量文章网络

“科学知识代表了许多研究人员随着时间的推移取得的成就”——美国心理学会(2020 年,第 253 页)以这句话开始了其关于引用和参考的四章报道。毫无疑问,作为研究人员,我们会影响彼此的工作。我们通过引用承认影响或赞扬他人的工作。通过检查参考列表,我们可以深入了解我们的工作是如何连接的。如果两篇文章出现在同一个参考文献列表中,则认为它们有关联。堪萨斯大学的研究员 W. Jake Thompson 说:“基于连接模式,可以生成一个网络并确定相关文章的邻域。”

本期封面以20 年的教育测量研究为特色,这是汤普森创建的一个共引网络。他描述道:

对于该网络,在 2000 年至 2019 年间发表在教育应用测量、应用心理测量、教育和心理测量、教育测量:问题和实践、教育和行为统计杂志、教育测量杂志或 Psychometrika 上的文章收集自Web of Science 数据库。这导致 4,093 篇文章引用了总共 56,531 篇其他文章。为了包含一个引文对,每个引文必须在所有文章中至少被引用 15 次,并且必须至少被一起引用 5 次。有了这些限制,网络由 157 个引用和 931 个连接组成。这些代表了过去 20 年中最常见的引用。最后,

正如所料,最大的集群由关于项目反应理论、诊断分类模型、微分项目功能和结构方程建模的引用组成。还有三个较小的集群,引用与多维评估、本地项目依赖和模型拟合相关。值得注意的是,与诊断分类模型相关的引文与其他集群相对孤立,与集群外部的引文只有很少的联系。所选期刊的样本当然不是详尽无遗的,但该网络概述了研究文献的关联方式,以及大粒度集群与其他集群的关联方式。

有兴趣的读者可以联系 W. Jake Thompson (jakethompson@ku.edu) 询问有关此图形、完整数据集和生成网络可视化代码的问题。

更新日期:2021-06-18
down
wechat
bug