ABSTRACT This article begins with the aftermath of the Delhi gangrape in 2012, which shook India and the wider world. It examines what new insights emerged as sexual violence and harassment became a touchstone for naming what ails women in India, in public life and for feminist politics. The essay goes on to point out how the special focus on violence has obscured the contexts structuring and constraining young women students’ aspirations, namely the peculiar twin developments of near parity in access to higher education coupled with one of the lowest female work participation rates in the world. The arrival of #MeToo in India from 1917, first in academia and then in several workplaces, brings in a further twist. Through the controversial staging of anonymous lists and collective testimonies through social media, the experience of #MeToo in India has revealed the ongoing force of a politics of naming acts of sexual harassment in a hostile climate where “job loss growth” is only going to increase most women’s exclusion from employment and their greater dependency on men. I liken this contradiction to a new form of “hermeneutic injustice,” which calls for vigilance and understanding as protests change their face yet again.

中文翻译：

---

印度的女权主义、性暴力和#MeToo 时代

摘要本文从 2012 年德里黑帮事件的后果开始，该事件震惊了印度和更广阔的世界。它考察了当性暴力和性骚扰成为命名印度、公共生活和女权主义政治中妇女的困扰的试金石时，出现了哪些新见解。这篇文章接着指出，对暴力的特别关注如何掩盖了构成和限制年轻女学生愿望的背景，即接受高等教育的机会近乎平等以及女性工作参与率最低的特殊双重发展。世界。#MeToo 从 1917 年开始在印度出现，首先是在学术界，然后是在几个工作场所，带来了进一步的转折。通过有争议的匿名名单和社交媒体集体证词，#MeToo 在印度的经历揭示了在敌对环境中命名性骚扰行为的政治的持续力量，在这种环境中，“失业增长”只会增加大多数女性被排除在就业之外，并更加依赖男性。我将这种矛盾比作一种新形式的“解释学不公正”，当抗议再次改变面貌时，需要保持警惕和理解。