ABSTRACT With respect to research on violent conflict, violent masculinities and masculinities linked to military or military-style organizations have received considerable attention. Such forms of violent masculinity are often seen as hegemonic. Based on our research in Aceh, Indonesia, we suggest that the conflation of hegemonic forms of masculinity with militarization and violence overlooks the many ways in which civilian men use political mechanisms of hegemonic masculinity to create consent while remaining explicitly non-violent and thus contribute to non-violent ways of managing conflict. Drawing on vignettes of Acehnese men’s experiences, we identify three strategies of conflict prevention and management to achieve relative hegemony in non-violent ways: strategic appeasement, creating safe spaces and transforming militarized masculinities. The ways in which these men participate in peace-building contribute to reducing violence, yet do not necessarily challenge hegemonic masculinities. Our case study of conflict-related masculinities in Aceh paints a nuanced picture of what comes to be seen as hegemonic in a given society at a given point in time and what can be contested. We demonstrate the importance of understanding conflict management through an approach that includes non-violent forms of masculinities and focuses on hegemonic masculinity as a political mechanism of consent creation.

中文翻译：

---

传教士、海盗与和平建设：审视亚齐的非暴力霸权男子气概

摘要 关于暴力冲突的研究，暴力男子气概和与军事或军事式组织有关的男子气概受到了相当大的关注。这种形式的暴力男子气概通常被视为霸权。根据我们在印度尼西亚亚齐的研究，我们认为将男性气质的霸权形式与军事化和暴力混为一谈忽略了平民男性使用霸权男性气质的政治机制来达成同意的多种方式，同时保持明确的非暴力，从而有助于促进管理冲突的非暴力方式。借鉴亚齐男性的经验，我们确定了三种以非暴力方式实现相对霸权的冲突预防和管理策略：战略绥靖、创造安全空间和转变军事化的男子气概。这些人参与和平建设的方式有助于减少暴力，但不一定挑战霸权的男子气概。我们对亚齐与冲突相关的男子气概的案例研究描绘了一幅微妙的画面，描绘了在特定时间点的特定社会中什么被视为霸权，以及什么可以有争议。我们通过一种包括非暴力形式的男性气质并专注于霸权男性气质作为产生同意的政治机制的方法来证明理解冲突管理的重要性。我们对亚齐与冲突相关的男子气概的案例研究描绘了一幅微妙的画面，描绘了在特定时间点的特定社会中什么被视为霸权，以及什么可以有争议。我们通过一种包括非暴力形式的男性气质并专注于霸权男性气质作为产生同意的政治机制的方法来证明理解冲突管理的重要性。我们对亚齐与冲突相关的男子气概的案例研究描绘了一幅微妙的画面，描绘了在特定时间点的特定社会中什么被视为霸权，以及什么可以有争议。我们通过一种包括非暴力形式的男性气质并专注于霸权男性气质作为产生同意的政治机制的方法来证明理解冲突管理的重要性。