The article analyzes the method of oral disputation in Keckermann’s Gymnasium logicum (f. p. 1605), in his Systematis logici plenioris pars altera (this is a variant of the first treatise, f. p. 1609), in Logicae artis compendium (1615) by Robert Sanderson, and in Ars disserendi seu Logica (1667) by Jacques Chanevelle, S.J. It demonstrates that the disputation method described in Gymnasium logicum consists in the Objection-solving paradigmatic method and, with a qualification, in the Asking-answering paradigmatic method. Most importantly, it shows that both Sanderson and Chanevelle utilize various Keckermann’s elements in the descriptions of disputation. Keckermann therefore seems to play part in the emergence of the Second-scholasticism disputation handbooks.

中文翻译：

---

Bartholomäus Keckermann 所著的《体育馆逻辑学》中的口头辩论和相关的 17 世纪手稿

文章分析了 Keckermann 的 Gymnasium logicum (fp 1605)、他的 Systematis logici plenioris pars altera（这是第一篇论文的变体，fp 1609）、Robert Sanderson 的 Logicae artis compendium (1615) 中的口头辩论方法，以及在 Ars disserendi seu Logica (1667) by Jacques Chanevelle, SJ 它证明了 Gymnasium logicum 中描述的争论方法包含在异议解决范式方法中，并且有条件地包含在问答范式方法中。最重要的是，它表明桑德森和夏内维尔在描述争论时都利用了各种凯克曼的要素。因此，凯克曼似乎在第二经院哲学争论手册的出现中发挥了作用。