ABSTRACT In the early 2000s, a wave of restoration and reuse of historic buildings began in some of Iran’s tourist cities. The aim of these reuse projects, performed by both the private and public sectors, is to transform these buildings into places for tourist, catering, cultural and residential use. A similar trend started in Tehran a few years ago, with the historic buildings mostly located on the central streets or in old neighborhoods being transformed into cafés, galleries, and cultural centers, etc. However, due to the newness of this issue, little research has been conducted on the effects of these changes on the adjacent urban fabric and the lives of local residents. The aim of this study, therefore, is to evaluate the effects of the adaptive reuse of three historic buildings from the viewpoint of local residents. These buildings are located in different parts of the Oudladjan neighborhood in the historical center of Tehran. Data about the selected cases were collected through observations and semi-structured interviews. A total of 40 individuals were interviewed. In addition to the residents, seven in-depth interviews were conducted with experts from the Heritage Organisation, municipality, and with academics. The collected data were analyzed using qualitative methods. The results of this qualitative study show that these reuses have not had any significant positive effect on the life of residents or the regeneration of the neighborhood. The most important reasons for this are: the adoption of a non-participatory, top-down approach, disregarding the needs and priorities of the local citizens, and disregarding the existing context by the authorities.

中文翻译：

---

当地社区对建筑再利用影响的态度：德黑兰老街区的三个案例

摘要 在 2000 年代初期，伊朗的一些旅游城市开始了历史建筑修复和再利用的浪潮。这些由私营和公共部门共同执行的再利用项目的目的是将这些建筑改造成旅游、餐饮、文化和居住的场所。几年前，德黑兰也出现了类似的趋势，历史建筑大多位于中心街道或老街区，被改造成咖啡馆、画廊、文化中心等。但由于这个问题的新鲜性，很少有研究已经对这些变化对邻近城市结构和当地居民生活的影响进行了研究。因此，本研究的目的是从当地居民的角度评估三座历史建筑的适应性再利用的效果。这些建筑位于德黑兰历史中心的 Oudladjan 社区的不同地方。有关所选案例的数据是通过观察和半结构化访谈收集的。一共采访了40个人。除了居民之外，还与来自遗产组织、市政当局和学者的专家进行了七次深度访谈。使用定性方法分析收集的数据。这项定性研究的结果表明，这些再利用对居民的生活或社区的更新没有任何显着的积极影响。最重要的原因是：采用非参与性、自上而下的方法，无视当地公民的需求和优先事项，以及当局无视现有背景。