ABSTRACT The 1970s and 1980s mark a turning point in urban planning and architecture in the Netherlands. In reaction to the modernist urban planning of earlier decades, Dutch policy-makers and architects now aimed to restore “human beings as the measure of all things.” The penultimate example of Dutch architecture of this period is the so-called cauliflower neighborhood (“bloemkoolwijk”). These residential areas were deliberately constructed to stage “spontaneous” encounters between neighbors to stimulate social bonding and to encourage identification with the built environment. This article examines the discrepancy between the underlying assumptions of an ideal community, materialized in the design of cauliflower neighborhoods in the 1970s and 1980s, and the daily life experiences of contemporary residents living in two such neighborhoods. The article shows that instead of contributing to community building, the neighborhood design resulted in a lack of social cohesion in cauliflower neighborhoods.

中文翻译：

---

过去的规划

摘要 1970 年代和 1980 年代标志着荷兰城市规划和建筑的转折点。作为对前几十年现代主义城市规划的回应，荷兰的政策制定者和建筑师现在的目标是恢复“以人为本”。这一时期荷兰建筑的倒数第二个例子是所谓的花椰菜街区（“bloemkoolwijk”）。这些住宅区的建造是为了让邻居之间“自发”相遇，以刺激社会联系并鼓励对建筑环境的认同。本文探讨了理想社区的基本假设（在 1970 年代和 1980 年代设计的花椰菜社区）与居住在两个此类社区的当代居民的日常生活体验之间的差异。