当前位置: X-MOL 学术Ibsen Studies › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
THOMAS OSTERMEIER’S AN ENEMY OF THE PEOPLE IN ISTANBUL
Ibsen Studies Pub Date : 2018-01-02 , DOI: 10.1080/15021866.2018.1473086
BURÇ İDEM DİNÇEL

Wherever a theatrical event is encountered, and whatever type of performance or production is witnessed, one experiences an artform that demonstrates various kinds of conflict. The theatrical genre really does not matter; even pieces made as popular culture for immediate consumption rely on simple conflict to pique the curiosity of the spectator, who in all likelihood will consume the work tout de suite without necessarily registering this conflict. The very dynamics of drama are inscribed with conflict and it cuts across genres. Within these conflict-ridden dynamics, dialectics comes to the fore; they are the vital element of drama and actualise its potential to advance critical thinking. This cannot happen only on the page; without putting dialectics into practice, theatre cannot exercise its potency. The art of theatre is, by its nature, nothing short of the communal act that comes into passing with the palpability of the here and now. As such, its praxis cannot exist without an audience. And this symbiotic relationship between spectators and performers is redolent with the dialectics intrinsic to theatre. Theatre realises its potential to challenge established values, to resist dominant policies and—to use a well-worn expression—“to change the world” by raising the critical awareness of the audience through its dialectical features, even when changing the world is not the end in itself. That dialectics is a recurrent notion in discourses on contemporary directing urges one to explicitly frame the terms of an argument that is to be pursued throughout a piece of critical writing, such as the present article. Drawing on the deep-seated affiliation

中文翻译:

托马斯·奥斯特迈尔是伊斯坦布尔人民的敌人

无论在何处遇到戏剧事件,无论目睹何种类型的表演或制作,人们都会体验到一种展示各种冲突的艺术形式。戏剧类型真的不重要;即使是作为流行文化制作的供即时消费的作品也依赖于简单的冲突来激起观众的好奇心,他们很可能会消费这些作品,而不必记录这种冲突。戏剧的动态本身就充满了冲突,它跨越了流派。在这些充满冲突的动态中,辩证法脱颖而出;它们是戏剧的重要元素,并发挥其促进批判性思维的潜力。这不能只发生在页面上;不实践辩证法,戏剧就无法发挥其效力。戏剧艺术,就其本质而言,无非是随着此时此地的触感而发生的公共行为。因此,它的实践离不开观众。观众和表演者之间的这种共生关系与戏剧固有的辩证法有关。戏剧意识到它有潜力挑战既定的价值观,抵制主流政策,并用一种​​陈旧的表达方式——通过辩证法提高观众的批判意识,“改变世界”,即使改变世界不是最重要的结束本身。辩证法是当代导演话语中的一个反复出现的概念,这促使人们明确地构建将在一篇评论文章中所追求的论点的术语,例如本文。借鉴根深蒂固的从属关系 没有观众,它的实践就不可能存在。观众和表演者之间的这种共生关系与戏剧固有的辩证法有关。戏剧意识到它有潜力挑战既定的价值观,抵制主流政策,并用一种​​陈旧的表达方式——通过辩证法提高观众的批判意识,“改变世界”,即使改变世界不是最重要的结束本身。辩证法是当代导演话语中的一个反复出现的概念,这促使人们明确地构建将在一篇评论文章中所追求的论点的术语,例如本文。借鉴根深蒂固的从属关系 没有观众,它的实践就不可能存在。观众和表演者之间的这种共生关系与戏剧固有的辩证法有关。戏剧意识到它有潜力挑战既定的价值观,抵制主流政策,并用一种​​陈旧的表达方式——通过辩证法提高观众的批判意识,“改变世界”,即使改变世界不是最重要的结束本身。辩证法是当代导演话语中的一个反复出现的概念,这促使人们明确地构建将在一篇评论文章中所追求的论点的术语,例如本文。借鉴根深蒂固的从属关系 戏剧意识到它有潜力挑战既定的价值观,抵制主流政策,并用一种​​陈旧的表达方式——通过辩证法提高观众的批判意识,“改变世界”,即使改变世界不是最重要的结束本身。辩证法是当代导演话语中反复出现的概念,这促使人们明确地构建将在一篇评论文章中所追求的论点的术语,例如本文。借鉴根深蒂固的从属关系 戏剧意识到它有潜力挑战既定的价值观,抵制主流政策,并用一种​​陈旧的表达方式——通过辩证法提高观众的批判意识,“改变世界”,即使改变世界不是最重要的结束本身。辩证法是当代导演话语中的一个反复出现的概念,这促使人们明确地构建将在一篇评论文章中所追求的论点的术语,例如本文。借鉴根深蒂固的从属关系 辩证法是当代导演话语中的一个反复出现的概念,这促使人们明确地构建将在一篇评论文章中所追求的论点的术语,例如本文。借鉴根深蒂固的从属关系 辩证法是当代导演话语中的一个反复出现的概念,这促使人们明确地构建将在一篇评论文章中所追求的论点的术语,例如本文。借鉴根深蒂固的从属关系
更新日期:2018-01-02
down
wechat
bug