textabstractIn dealing with wicked problems, policymakers increasingly are confronted with three competing ‘knowledge claims’: the notion of evidence-based policy, alternative ‘commons knowledge’ created by citizens, and ‘fact-free’ politics. Consequently, the knowledge base for dealing with wicked problems is becoming increasingly contested. This paper analyses the ways in which these three competing knowledge claims interact, and the consequences of their interaction, through a case study of the dynamics of knowledge claims in Dutch climate policy. The paper concludes that the quest for evidence-based policy may constitute an impediment to progress in finding common ground in practical policies.

中文翻译：

---

荷兰气候变化政策的有争议的知识

textabstract 在处理棘手问题时，政策制定者越来越多地面临着三个相互竞争的“知识主张”：基于证据的政策的概念、公民创造的替代“公共知识”和“无事实”政治。因此，处理棘手问题的知识库正变得越来越有争议。本文通过对荷兰气候政策中知识主张动态的案例研究，分析了这三种相互竞争的知识主张相互作用的方式，以及它们相互作用的后果。该文件的结论是，寻求循证政策可能会阻碍在实际政策中找到共同点。