In debates about the metaphysics of material objects examples of colocated objects are commonly taken to be examples of coincidence too. But the argument that colocation is best understood as involving coincidence is never spelled out. This paper shows under what conditions colocation entails coincidence and argues that the entailment depends on a principle that actually rules out certain forms of colocation. This undermines the argument from colocation to coincidence.

中文翻译：

---

注意间隔

在关于物质对象的形而上学的辩论中，共置对象的例子通常也被视为巧合的例子。但是，关于托管最好理解为涉及巧合的论点从未被阐明。本文展示了在什么条件下托管需要巧合，并认为蕴涵取决于实际上排除某些形式的托管的原则。这削弱了从托管到巧合的论点。