This inquiry unearths the stratified nature of racial harm in higher education by applying counterstorytelling to fashion an equity case study on racial harm. Racial harm consists of four conditions (hyper-cognition, hyper-isolation, hyper-distress, and hyper-reactivity) brought on by persistent exposure to racial discrimination embedded subtlety within academic departments as a series of racialized conflicts (diversity & curriculum clashes, and relational & power dynamics). To advance the use of qualitative research to end racism in higher education, we offer a true-telling framework, a guide for talking back, a research typology to unearth the pandemic of racism infecting faculty relations.

这项调查通过应用反故事来形成关于种族伤害的公平案例研究，揭示了高等教育中种族伤害的分层性质。种族伤害包括四种情况（过度认知、过度孤立、过度痛苦和过度反应），这是由于持续暴露在学术部门内嵌入微妙的种族歧视所带来的一系列种族冲突（多样性和课程冲突，以及关系和权力动态）。为了推进定性研究在高等教育中结束种族主义的使用，我们提供了一个真实的框架、一个回话指南、一个研究类型，以揭示影响教师关系的种族主义大流行。