The article addresses the Enrica Lexie case as an example of integration between adjudicative and diplomatic means of dispute settlement. It illustrates the case focusing on the Tribunal’s assessment of the scope of its jurisdiction and of the applicable law. The article is organised in four parts, next to the introduction. First, it places the case in the context of the relationship between adjudication and diplomacy in the settlement of international disputes. Second, it illustrates the case as a dispute over the interpretation and application of UNCLOS. Third, it addresses the relevance of the immunity of the marines for the purposes of the jurisdiction of the Tribunal and the applicable law. Finally, it concludes with few general policy remarks on the beneficial impact of the Award for the disputing and third Parties, as to the balancing of the interests of flag-States and costal-States in interpreting and applying freedom of navigation.

中文翻译：

---

为外交服务的裁决：Enrica Lexie 案

文章将 Enrica Lexie 案作为裁决和外交解决争端手段相结合的一个例子。它说明了该案，重点是法庭对其管辖范围和适用法律的评估。这篇文章分为四个部分，在介绍旁边。首先，它将案件置于国际争端解决中的裁决与外交关系的背景下。其次，将本案阐释为对《公约》解释和适用的争议。第三，它解决了海军陆战队豁免权与法庭管辖权和适用法律的相关性。最后，它在总结该裁决对争议各方和第三方的有益影响时很少发表一般性政策评论，