当前位置: X-MOL 学术J. Fam. Trauma Child Cust. Child Devel. › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Parental responsibilities: Reformulating the paradigm for parent–child relationships Part 1: What is wrong with the ways in which we deal with the children of separated parents and how to put them right
Journal of Family Trauma, Child Custody & Child Development Pub Date : 2017-07-03 , DOI: 10.1080/15379418.2017.1369920
Philip Marcus 1
Affiliation  

ABSTRACT This is the first part of a two-part article, which calls for the removal of terms such as rights and custody, including joint and shared custody, and visitation from the legal discourse in relation to children and their parents. This part demonstrates how the current discourse, based on the competing rights of the parents, leads inevitably to competitiveness and litigation, which are highly damaging to the child. The proposed paradigm of parental responsibilities requires establishing the needs of the specific child when there are parental disharmony and separation, while emphasizing the joint responsibilities of both parents to ensure that those needs are adequately met. This part also addresses the question: who has parental responsibilities, when a child is born as a result of Assisted Reproductive Technology, and also the quasi-parental role of the court.

中文翻译:

父母责任:重新制定亲子关系范式第 1 部分:我们与分居父母的孩子打交道的方式有什么问题以及如何纠正他们

摘要 这是一篇由两部分组成的文章的第一部分,该文章呼吁从有关儿童及其父母的法律话语中删除权利和监护权等条款,包括共同和共同监护权以及探视权。这部分展示了当前基于父母竞争权利的话语如何不可避免地导致竞争和诉讼,这对孩子的伤害很大。父母责任的提议范式要求在父母不和谐和分离时确定特定孩子的需求,同时强调父母双方的共同责任以确保这些需求得到充分满足。这部分还解决了以下问题:当孩子因辅助生殖技术而出生时,谁负有父母责任,
更新日期:2017-07-03
down
wechat
bug