issues at stake (159). Jarvis challenges here one of the commonplaces in revolutionary historiography, namely that the revolutionaries excluded women from politics because of patriarchal notions that they inherited from Rousseau. This book, then, makes gender less central to our understanding of citizenship in the French Revolution. As Jarvis puts it: ‘Although the Dames considered gendered work a critical part of their citizenship, they did not articulate gender as the initial filter for delineating citizenship or as its immutable starting point’ (80). The research behind this book is impressive, and the level of detail brings the hustle and bustle of Les Halles in the late eighteenth century to life. Jarvis shows how the abstract ideas of economic and political theory debated by the revolutionaries in the convention affected, and were challenged by, daily life. The weaving together of economic theory and historical detail makes it difficult, at times, to follow the argument, but those who make the effort will be richly rewarded. Jarvis has placed social and economic history back at the centre of revolutionary historiography. Her book will remain indispensable reading for years to come.

中文翻译：

---

早期法国妇女出版社中的女性形象，1758-1848 年

利害攸关的问题 (159)。贾维斯在这里挑战了革命史学中的一个普遍现象，即革命者将女性排除在政治之外，因为她们从卢梭那里继承了父权观念。因此，这本书让性别对于我们理解法国大革命中的公民身份不再那么重要。正如贾维斯所说：“虽然贵妇人认为性别工作是其公民身份的重要组成部分，但他们并没有将性别表述为界定公民身份的最初过滤器或其不可改变的起点”（80）。这本书背后的研究令人印象深刻，其细节水平将 18 世纪晚期 Les Halles 的喧嚣带入了生活。贾维斯展示了革命者在大会上辩论的经济和政治理论的抽象思想如何影响，并受到日常生活的挑战。经济理论和历史细节交织在一起，有时很难理解这个论点，但那些做出努力的人会得到丰厚的回报。贾维斯将社会和经济史重新置于革命史学的中心。她的书在未来几年仍将是不可或缺的读物。