ABSTRACT ‘Will, preferences and rights’ is the new guiding principle for all support for or exercise of decision-making under the Convention on Rights of Persons with Disabilities, but its meaning is disputed and practice implications are poorly understood. This article explores key debates across disciplines and draws on grounded theory fieldwork findings to bring greater clarity to the principle within law, policy and practice settings. It is argued that the principle calls for a nuanced understanding which cautions against expectations that mere enactment into law or adoption within programs of support will prove to be a panacea.

中文翻译：

---

实现“意愿、偏好和权利”：调和最佳实践支持决策的差异？

摘要 “意愿、偏好和权利”是《残疾人权利公约》下所有支持或行使决策的新指导原则，但其含义存在争议，实践意义也知之甚少。本文探讨了跨学科的关键辩论，并借鉴了扎根理论的实地调查结果，使法律、政策和实践环境中的原则更加清晰。有人争辩说，该原则要求一种微妙的理解，它告诫人们不要期望仅仅制定法律或在支持计划中采用就可以证明是灵丹妙药。