当前位置: X-MOL 学术International Forum of Psychoanalysis › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
An extract of the analysis of the Monkey Puzzle Boy
International Forum of Psychoanalysis ( IF 0.9 ) Pub Date : 2019-07-23 , DOI: 10.1080/0803706x.2019.1634286
Fergal Brady

Abstract A client who wants his story to be made into a case history presents for psychoanalysis. An artist all his adult life, he expresses his sexual trauma through his art. His more recent artistic output is in the form of avant-garde video montages. The analysis stalls, becalmed by a failure to understand a circumcision event, a punishment for sexual expression. If Ferenczi and the Budapest school model learning from therapeutic errors, freedom of thought, sincerity, and experimentation, then this case history illustrates those. Real sexual trauma and a real circumcision event are entangled with fantasy and art in attempts to come to terms with them. The circumcision event was better understood with multiple readings of Carlo Bonomi’s work, which became part of the analysis. The wider Ferenczi community also became part of the story of the analysis, and in a kind of mutuality the analysis wants to make a contribution to that body of knowledge.

中文翻译:

猴子拼图男孩的分析摘录

摘要 一位希望将自己的故事编成病历的来访者提出进行精神分析。作为一名成年艺术家,他通过艺术表达了他的性创伤。他最近的艺术作品是前卫的视频蒙太奇形式。由于无法理解割礼事件,对性表达的惩罚,分析停滞不前。如果 Ferenczi 和布达佩斯学派的模型从治疗错误、思想自由、真诚和实验中学习,那么这个案例历史说明了这些。真正的性创伤和真正的割礼事件与幻想和艺术纠缠在一起,试图与它们达成协议。通过多次阅读 Carlo Bonomi 的作品,可以更好地理解割礼事件,这成为分析的一部分。
更新日期:2019-07-23
down
wechat
bug