ABSTRACT

This study aimed to explore the rigor strategies and ethical steps reported in qualitative research of educational administration journals in the recent decades. Using a focused search procedure, 321 relevant empirical qualitative articles were identified. Results suggest that qualitative educational administration, management, and leadership research frequently reported using some rigor strategies and greatly underreport on using ethical steps. Moreover, we found stability in the number of strategies and steps reported over a period of two decades. Thus, it is unclear whether rigor and ethics norms in the field have been crystallizing over time. The findings and their implications are discussed.

摘要

本研究旨在探讨近几十年来教育管理期刊定性研究中报告的严格策略和道德步骤。使用重点搜索程序，确定了 321 篇相关的实证定性文章。结果表明，定性教育行政、管理和领导力研究经常报告使用一些严格的策略，而大大低估了使用道德步骤的情况。此外，我们发现二十年来报告的策略和步骤数量保持稳定。因此，尚不清楚该领域的严格性和道德规范是否随着时间的推移而具体化。讨论了研究结果及其影响。